<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vermont&#8217;s One Sided Battle Over Same-Sex Marraige</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lezgetreal.com/2009/03/vermonts-one-sided-battle-over-same-sex-marraige/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lezgetreal.com/2009/03/vermonts-one-sided-battle-over-same-sex-marraige/</link>
	<description>A Gay Girl&#039;s View on the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Marriage Equality Vs. Unhappy Exes &#171; Proud to be a PUMA</title>
		<link>http://lezgetreal.com/2009/03/vermonts-one-sided-battle-over-same-sex-marraige/comment-page-1/#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator>Marriage Equality Vs. Unhappy Exes &#171; Proud to be a PUMA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lezgetreal.com/?p=5142#comment-3250</guid>
		<description>[...] http://lezgetreal.com/?p=5142 A new Rutland Herald editorial for 8 March even asked these questions: “Have eight years of civil unions in Vermont harmed you or your state? Have civil unions harmed the marriages of heterosexual Vermonters in any way?” The answer, of course, it no. Vermont has not been harmed by having civil unions, and heterosexual marriage has not completely collapsed while it is in existence. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://lezgetreal.com/?p=5142" rel="nofollow">http://lezgetreal.com/?p=5142</a> A new Rutland Herald editorial for 8 March even asked these questions: “Have eight years of civil unions in Vermont harmed you or your state? Have civil unions harmed the marriages of heterosexual Vermonters in any way?” The answer, of course, it no. Vermont has not been harmed by having civil unions, and heterosexual marriage has not completely collapsed while it is in existence. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lezgetreal</title>
		<link>http://lezgetreal.com/2009/03/vermonts-one-sided-battle-over-same-sex-marraige/comment-page-1/#comment-37359</link>
		<dc:creator>lezgetreal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lezgetreal.com/?p=5142#comment-37359</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Now on LGR: Vermont’s One Sided Battle Over Same-Sex Marraige: The battle for marriage equality in Ve.. http://tinyurl.com/dfcdp4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Now on LGR: Vermont’s One Sided Battle Over Same-Sex Marraige: The battle for marriage equality in Ve.. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dfcdp4" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dfcdp4</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

