Connect With Us

FacebookTwitterRSSYoutube

Teabaggers Attack Rachel Maddow On Twitter

2009 Tax Day Tea Bag Protest
Image by Benny BNut via Flickr

02/09/2010- by Natasia Langfelder

Yesterday Rhodes News and a small contingent of follows attacked Rachel Maddow online. It seems that the Tea Bag party members object to Maddow using the term “Teabaggers” to describe them. It seems that they object to this term as it implies an explicit sexual act. I won’t get into the details, but go watch the episode of Sex and the City to see how this term launched into the American venacular. Maddow was not the first person to coin this term or to apply it to the rising conservative tea bag party. She is also not the only media figure who refers to them as Teabaggers.

However, yesterday on Twitter they attempted a pathetic attack on Maddow.

The offended Teabaggers wrote:

WeThePeople1st: RT @victoria_29: RT @RhodesNews: If @RachelMaddow insists on calling us “Tea Baggers,” is she thus gving us implicit permission 2 call her “dyke”? #p2 #tcot 1 day ago from TweetDeck

victoria_29: RT @RhodesNews: If @RachelMaddow insists on calling us “Tea Baggers,” is she thus gving us implicit permission 2 call her “dyke”? #p2 #tcot

CoachDB18: MadCow! Nuf' said! @RhodesNews @RachelMaddow calling us “Tea Baggers,” …thus giving us permission to call her “dyke”? #p2 #tcot #lcot

nana49: RT @RhodesNews: If @RachelMaddow insists on calling us “Tea Baggers,” is she thus giving us implicit permission to call her “dyke”? #p2 #tcot #lcot

WeThePeople1st: RT @RhodesNews: If @RachelMaddow insists on calling us “Tea Baggers,” is she thus giving us implicit permission to call her “dyke”? #p2 #tcot #lcot

RhodesNews: If @RachelMaddow insists on calling us “Tea Baggers,” is she thus giving us implicit permission to call her “dyke”? #p2 #tcot #lcot

With this attack the Teabaggers are firmly cementing their reputation as nasty, right wing nuts. It goes without saying that no, there is no implicit right that can be found in any situation that would make it ok to call someone a dyke.  Dyke is a pejorative term that people have used to attack the LBQ community both verbally and physically. Women have been called dykes by people who have stabbed them, raped them, killed them. There is no comparison between calling someone a Teabagger and calling someone a dyke.

As the Republican party decides whether or not to embrace the Teabaggers, one can only hope they take the overwhelming hatred and bitterness of this radical faction into consideration.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Share This Post

Gif-animated

19 Responses to Teabaggers Attack Rachel Maddow On Twitter

  1. Gail Reply

    February 10, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    You should follow RM’s twitter stream more often. This is not new, it’s everyday and night, and often times it’s worse..

  2. Kaz Reply

    February 10, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    What a nasty, rude little man. And kinda dense to not even get her Twitter name right. Therein lies the difference, Rachel checks her facts. Also, she wouldn’t stopp so low as to start making personal attacks. I think it was Mrs Thatcher who said that when someone starts making personal attacks she knows she’s won the argument as they have nothing reasonable left to say.

  3. Tracy Coyle Reply

    February 10, 2010 at 8:10 am

    Maddow is a housewife.

  4. Pingback: Pam

  5. Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  6. Pingback: Y Grantham @4uqi

  7. Pingback: Betty Sharma

  8. Pingback: Gloria Edwards

  9. Pingback: Mary Crosby

  10. Pingback: Tweets that mention Teabaggers Attack Rachel Maddow On Twitter - Lez Get Real -- Topsy.com

  11. Pingback: Mo Latno

  12. Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  13. Sam Reply

    February 9, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    “Dyke” is one of those words where the person who is one can use it, but no one else. DYKES ON BIKES leads the San Francisco LBGT parade every year. My opinion – let the tea-baggers call us whatever they want – we’ll still use tea-bagger!

  14. Pingback: Queerjohn PA

  15. Pingback: Claude Gauvin

  16. CanuckJacq Reply

    February 9, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    It really is so perfect that they got her bloody twitter name wrong.

    • a.

      February 9, 2010 at 9:02 pm

      my thought exactly!

  17. Pingback: Natasia Rose

  18. Pingback: Michael Stryder

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>