You are here: Home » Featured » American Bar Association Backs Gay Marriage
Melanie Nathan Posted on 8-10-10
“RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges state, territorial, and tribal governments to eliminate all of their legal barriers to civil marriage between two persons of the same sex who are otherwise eligible to marry.”
“With this action, the American Bar Association has affirmed the principles upon which this nation was founded—that every American is vested with certain inalienable rights and that all Americans are created equal,” said Chad Griffin, Board President of the American Foundation for Equal Rights. “The ABA’s action is significant in that it represents a broad consensus among scholars and practitioners of the law. The ABA is the nation’s leading legal organization and is the one charged with recommending judges and setting national standards for attorneys. This case is not about ideology or politics, and the ABA’s resolution underscores that. Rather, Perry v. Schwarzenegger is a case grounded in fundamental constitutional law and precedent, including equal protection under the law and due process.”
“By approving a resolution in support of marriage equality, the ABA has confirmed what the federal courts, the state’s chief executive and the state’s chief law enforcement officer have determined in Perry v. Schwarzenegger—that excluding gay men and lesbians from marriage violates their constitutional right to due process and equal protection and causes significant harm to them and their families,” Griffin added, referring to the Governor and Attorney General.
The American Foundation for Equal Rights is the organization that launched the Perry v. Schwarzenegger case and brought together attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies (who opposed each other in arguing Bush v. Gore) to lead its litigation. Last week, the Chief Judge of the Federal District Court, Northern District of California issued a 136-page ruling that found that California’s Proposition 8, which stripped gays and lesbians of their right to marry, was unconstitutional, citing its denial of the constitutional protections of equal protection under the law and due process, among other findings.
The City and County of San Francisco, led by City Attorney Dennis Herrera and Chief Deputy City Attorney Therese Stewart, are supporting the plaintiffs’ team as co-counsel, with a specific focus on the negative impact Proposition 8 has on government services and budgets. (San Francisco Sentinel)
For full trial transcripts of the trial as well as legal filings, click here.
Melanie Nathan
nathan@prvatecourts.com
@oblogdeeoblogda
Jennifer White
August 11, 2010 at 1:51 am
You know, President Obama should consider this resolution from the ABA, the positions taken by the governor and attorney general of California, and Judge Walker’s ruling itself, as supporting and compelling reasons to let Judge Tauro’s ruling striking down DOMA stand. The president has already stated that he believes DOMA is unconstitutional and discriminatory. These other events/actions from esteemed legal experts support the view that he already held. He could decide to let Judge Tauro’s ruling stand, and issue an executive order stating that all federal agencies will recognize any marriage or civil union/partnership from any U.S. state or territory. That would also demonstrate recognition of states rights.
Doing this would also encourage the party, the voting demographic, and would do so just in time for elections. If he took these steps some of the legislation currently in congress for review/vote, would no longer be needed. It would free up some of the congressional calendar to a degree as well, and prevent senate democrats from having to vote on this controversial issue. In 2012 his campaign could remind the public if this even came up, that what he did was reinstate state rights that congress had taken away when it enacted DOMA in the 1990′s.
I read that 12% of the population identifies as gay or bisexual. If each person has even one friend or family member that supports them, then that’s 24% of the population with a pro-inclusive interest in this issue. That is very significant. It is also shameful to America as a whole that Canada and Mexico, the two bordering nations of the greatest free country in the world, now both recognize gay marriage and give their citizens greater civil rights for families, than are available to citizens of the U.S.