Connect With Us

FacebookTwitterRSSYoutube

Second Major Multi-Plaintiff Lawsuit Challenges DOMA

Marriage Equality- its a right

Melanie Nathan – November 09, 2010

On November 9, 2010 GLAD  filed their second major, multi-plaintiff lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and the government’s denial of protections and responsibilities to married gay and lesbian couples. This new action specifically addresses married couples in Connecticut, Vermont,  and New Hampshire, and comes on the heels of a Massachusetts Federal District Court ruling this summer finding DOMA Section 3 unconstitutional.

“DOMA must fall. In 1996, when Congress passed DOMA, the stated goal was to harm gay people and same-sex families with this law, and sadly, it has succeeded.  Married gay and lesbian couples fall through the federal safety nets that exist for other married people,” said Mary L. Bonauto, Civil Rights Project Director for GLAD.  “We have to keep the pressure on and get DOMA off the books before it does even more harm.”

In Pedersen et al. v. Office of Personnel Management, GLAD represents five married same-sex couples and a widower who have all been denied federal rights and protections simply because they are married to a person of the same sex.

”Getting married was extremely meaningful to Ann and me,” said Joanne Pedersen, who, with her spouse Ann Meitzen, is a plaintiff.  “We were shocked to discover that the federal government essentially looks on ours as a second-class marriage.”

Filed in Federal District Court in Connecticut, this suit addresses DOMA’s denial of marriages in connection with federal employees and retirees benefits programs, Social Security benefits, survivor benefits under federal pension laws, work leave to care for a spouse under the Family Medical Leave Act, and state retiree health insurance plans that are controlled by federal tax law.  Several plaintiffs who have paid additional federal income taxes because they cannot file a joint federal tax return as a married couple will join the suit once they are officially turned down for refunds from the IRS.

“Every day that DOMA stands, it arbitrarily divides married couples into two categories,”  said Gary D. Buseck, GLAD’s Legal Director. “And the extra burdens that DOMA has imposed on Massachusetts families since 2004 are now being endured by families in Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Share This Post

Attain IVF 468x60

2 Responses to Second Major Multi-Plaintiff Lawsuit Challenges DOMA

  1. Anthony Reply

    November 10, 2010 at 12:22 am

    “We were shocked to discover that the federal government essentially looks on ours as a second-class marriage.”

    I am pretty sure that they dont look at you as a “second class marriage”. They dont look at us as married at all!!!

  2. FAEN Reply

    November 9, 2010 at 3:10 pm

    I feel this is the only way were going to win. The GOTP will never repeal anything with ‘gay’ on it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>