<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Dominated MN Supreme Court Sides With GOP Over Marriage Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lezgetreal.com/2012/08/gop-dominated-mn-supreme-court-sides-with-gop-over-marriage-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lezgetreal.com/2012/08/gop-dominated-mn-supreme-court-sides-with-gop-over-marriage-amendment/</link>
	<description>an LGBTA view from the Emerald Mountains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Booker</title>
		<link>http://lezgetreal.com/2012/08/gop-dominated-mn-supreme-court-sides-with-gop-over-marriage-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-284982</link>
		<dc:creator>Booker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lezgetreal.com/?p=126947#comment-284982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know; I certainly don&#039;t support the amendment, but I think both titles pretty clearly conveyed what it would do. The Sec of State&#039;s change does strike me as deliberately trying to sound more negative, but I doubt it&#039;ll make a difference either way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know; I certainly don&#8217;t support the amendment, but I think both titles pretty clearly conveyed what it would do. The Sec of State&#8217;s change does strike me as deliberately trying to sound more negative, but I doubt it&#8217;ll make a difference either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamas</title>
		<link>http://lezgetreal.com/2012/08/gop-dominated-mn-supreme-court-sides-with-gop-over-marriage-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-284967</link>
		<dc:creator>adamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lezgetreal.com/?p=126947#comment-284967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proper role for the judiciary, however, is not to second-guess the wisdom of policy decisions that the constitution commits to one of the political branches.”

Bullshit! Someone&#039;s not been paying attention in Civics class..OOPS! They don&#039;t teach that anymore do they? Apparently not because that&#039;s EXACTLY what the Judicial branch is SUPPOSED to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proper role for the judiciary, however, is not to second-guess the wisdom of policy decisions that the constitution commits to one of the political branches.”</p>
<p>Bullshit! Someone&#8217;s not been paying attention in Civics class..OOPS! They don&#8217;t teach that anymore do they? Apparently not because that&#8217;s EXACTLY what the Judicial branch is SUPPOSED to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
