Connect With Us

FacebookTwitterRSSYoutube

Listening To The Debate With One’s Eyes, Not One’s Ears

LezGetReal cannot live blog the way some of the other sites do, at least not efficiently. So, let us be honest here and also say that the substance of the debate is not likely to be all that important since we have pretty much heard every answer that these guys are going to give. From the live blogging going on around the net, though, it seems that Obama is on the offensive while Romney is on the defensive. That is probably not a good place to be when you’re the challenger.

I am not the best person when it comes to body language. Honestly, I don’t pick up body language cues unless I’m paying attention; however, the body language is interesting.

Mitt Romney comes across as patronizing. When he isn’t speaking, he has this perpetual ‘I know better than you’ smirk on his face. Making matters worse for Romney is the fact that he appears to be constantly looking just a little down his nose at everyone. He also doesn’t know what to do with his hands, and often gesticulates in a manner that looks like he is not so much explaining something as selling something. When Romney looks away from Obama, he tends to tilt his head downward, but he constantly tends to look down on President Obama.

President Barack Obama, conversely, always gives off this slight bit of flirting with his eyes. In a sense, while Romney’s face is kind of like this Obama’s is more like this /

Romney also appears stiff. He isn’t having a conversation with the American people, but rather he is lecturing the American people.

With regards to tone, Romney comes off as slightly flat and droning. He does not have a lot of change in pitch. Instead, he comes across as being a little lifeless. Obama, on the other hand, stresses a lot of his words. He has a slight iambic pentameter to his voice. When Romney says “more money because they are working” at one point, his voice barely rises and falls even though his body language, though stiff, comes across as assertive. Obama stated “reVEnu NEUtral way”. He isn’t angry, but his voice is animated. His demeanor calm. Obama seems very assured of his points as well while Romney seems to constantly be going “and-and-and”.

I’m not sure how this analysis plays against others. Andrew Sullivan over at The Daily Beast- and most of the people there too- appear to feel that Obama is losing the debate, but I’m not sure how the substance, which Romney appears to be lacking, will play against the non-verbal cues which seem to be stronger for Obama.

Share This Post

One Response to Listening To The Debate With One’s Eyes, Not One’s Ears

  1. Pat Carbonell

    October 4, 2012 at 12:12 pm

    Did you catch their ties? Red on Romney, blue on Obama. It was the only funny part of the debate. The unfortunate part of the debate was that as the challenger, Romney is selling the dream while as the incumbent, Obama has a record to defend… and he won’t explain to the American people that the biggest reason his record sucks on domestic issues is that the Republicans in Congress have opposed everything he has tried to do. In the first two years they had the power of the filibuster to stop anything truly visionary from happening, and for the past two, they held the House. Obama’s failures are not his, they are the failures of a partisan Congress determined to make him a one-term anachronism. Obamacare is an abortion because the Republicans would not allow it to be true health CARE reform, and reduced it to mere health INSURANCE reform. I have great hopes for Vermont’s upcoming single-payer system… which is the issue the Republican challenger for governor is attacking. Wherever Democrats have tried to make systemic changes for the future, Republicans have attacked them and undermined them. This is the true threat of a Romney win… the great American electorate being too uninformed to realize they are following a dream back to an oligarchy.