Connect With Us

FacebookTwitterRSSYoutube

Supreme Court Lacking Jurisdiction In DOMA Case?

The United States Supreme Court.

The United States Supreme Court. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The United States Supreme Court may not have jurisdiction over the case of Edith Windsor and her challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act. According to professor Vicki Jackson, who was hired to argue the positions regarding jurisdiction, the Court may not be able to hear the case because President Barack Obama decided to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act in court.

The Harvard Law Professor wrote in her filing that “The United States’ agreement with the courts below (and with Windsor) deprives this Court of jurisdiction, because the United States suffers no injury sufficient to invoke Article III jurisdiction.”

Jackson also wrote regarding the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group tha
t “It is the Executive Branch, not Congress, that is obligated to ‘take Care’ that laws are enforced. Moreover, any injury that might arise from nondefense of a law would be to the whole Congress, which one House cannot alone assert.”

The Supreme Court appointed Jackson to argue these positions as part of settling the matter of jurisdiction. The DoJ, BLAG and Windsor will have the ability to respond to the filing ahead of oral arguments.

Windsor – Standing/Juris Amicus by

Comments

comments

Share This Post

One Response to Supreme Court Lacking Jurisdiction In DOMA Case?

  1. Nick

    January 25, 2013 at 10:56 pm

    I don’t think she is right, the Supreme Court has the power to do pretty much anything they want. And regardless sooner or later DOMA will be history anyway, it’s just a matter of time now. Like it or not it will happen.